In my experience with enough practice you can learn to predict certain types of mistakes in a player which is a skill you can learn from playing the engine. Also as a final note, the ratings on those "bots" on chess.com are so clearly inflated to boost people's egos. So many sub 900s posting they "beat the 1500 bot".The best thing about daily chess (online correspondence-like) is you will play book lines even if you’re both less experienced, because opening book is allowed. Thus you get a chance to learn proper theory in game. You won’t be playing long book lines in lower level short time formats. 8.Only a certain subset of chess players will have FIDE ratings, and they may systematically differ from other chess players. Heteroscedasticity. Even without the residual plots, it looks like the regression line does a terrible job at predicting FIDE scores for blitz scores in the range [1500, 2250].chess.com's paid analysis is full of gimmicky, buggy and misleading features. If you want a quick full-game analysis report, you're much better off importing to lichess anyway, so that part is just not worth it. For puzzles, chesstempo has much better puzzles than both chess.com and lichess.A good strategy could be "play blitz until you are stuck at some rating point then play rapid for some time and come back to blitz to see if you improved". For me, maintaing a gap of around 150 in blitz and rapid rating works good (with blitz < rapid) (whenever the gap is disturbed, i try to stabilize the gap). I play on lichess.Lichess assigns 1500 as a provisional rating for new players. I believe chess.com uses 1200 instead. As a result chess.com ratings are about 300 points lower than lichess ratings. That's a bit simplistic since everybody is provisional for a while and the rating jumps quite a lot according to that. There are some differences but in general ...r/chess • Hikaru on his rivalry vs Magnus: "It wasn't a rivalry until the pandemic. He won every match against me, had a great score against me. Ever since the pandemic I've done better overall. He's one of the two best players of all time, and the fact that I'm able to compete with him makes me very happy."Last week I posted a post about making a wooden cat themed chess set and today the first Queen completed the sample. 1 / 7. 1.9K. 76. r/chessbeginners. Join. • 12 days ago. a month playing and 150 elo.Lichess has constant people who start games and then it aborts. Chess.com has somehow pretty effectively stamped this out. It’s the reason I play chess.com and not lichess. It’s hard to tell who has stronger players. I played a 1757 (!) on lichess who blundered his Queen in the Scandinavian on move 5. I seriously don't get this thing about ... I have achieved both 2300+ blitz ratings, on chess.com and lichess and I feel like achieving it on lichess feels more like I achieved 1000 rating or something ( "walk in the park") feels very easy , without much trying or stress, whether if I try to do the same on chess.com feels more like an endless torture back and forth.My son has a chesskids.com ranking of 1000, and we made a deal that if he reached rank 800 on chess.com, he'd get a reward. He says he prefers chesskids.com because he thinks there's a lot of cheaters on chess.com. I believe he's making an excuse as far as the chess.com cheaters are concerned. Likely, if he were better, he'd probably rank up ...Miscellaneous. Seems like there's a pretty big gap in rapid ratings but in blitz there's little difference. Sorry if this has been asked before. Vote.Hi everyone. I've been playing against the computer for years using chess.com, but have started to try lichess given the overwhelming popularity on this sub. I find it infuriating. Please help. I love the mobile board on chess.com, because I can easily hop into analysis to criticize what tactics I'm not seeing. Is this feature available on lichess?I'm a 1380 bullet player in chess.com, which is around 95% percentile and on lichess I'm rated 1700, which is around 67% percentile. This is a huge difference and obviously I'm an excellent player in chess.com players pool and little above average in lichess players pool. I played over 3000 games in both and play on the same level.It may be as simple as: C.c is on a mission to commercialize chess for profit, whereas Lichess is on a mission to make chess free and ad-free. So these are 2 entirely different business models. Instead of paying C.c, I donate a small amount to Lichess each month to support their costs. Yeah. Chess.com is for profit and Lichess mission is to ...There are 1,000 puzzles to play in the $4 paid version of Shredder Chess on iOS. The free version, Shredder Chess Lite, limits you 100 puzzles. The full version of Shredder Chess on Android is $3. ...On desktop computer, the only answer is both, chesscom isn't buggy at all there. com for better pieces and board styles, premoves, news and forums, 960 tourneys. lichess for all other tourneys, unlimited analysis, unlimited puzzles, and a great 3D wooden set to practice OTB. [deleted] • 3 yr. ago.Chess.com arguably has a lot more smurfs and cheaters than Lichess. But on to the basic note, Lichess ratings are just more inflated than Chess.com's. Everyone is saying the starting ratings are different and that's the reason for the discrepancy but you can choose your starting rating on chess.com.As someone who plays puzzles more than chess (daily and sometimes for hours) Lichess has signficantly poorer puzzles. Very obvious forks at 2500 lichess level, simple doubling, pinned pieces. Chess d com has some really obscure stuff at the 2800 level which running through an engine shows depth. I know chess d com bad but for puzzles not so much. Lichess has a better engine and it’s free. They both have the same variants, tournaments, and puzzles too. Chess.com has more variants, though they're not implemented particularly well. For most people, the difference between a depth 20 and depth 15 engine don't really matter that much. Chess.com vs Lichess. There seems to be a fair amount of jerks on chess.com i.e trolling, taunting, stalling etc. That’s usually the app where I play. I’ve used Lichess a few times and my opponents seem to be nicer. Quick to chat, offer a take back when I blunder, a small sample size. On chess.com you start at 1200 I believe while on lichess you start at 1500 so the elo on lichess on the lower levels is higher in comparison. On both sites you are a bit below starting elo so it's basically the same players you play. Lichess ratings run …On Lichess.org I hover around ~1350-1450 on Rapid 10+0 games, but on Chess.com I can't get past 1150. Are the rankings different? The level of players? Or because I've almost exclusively played on Lichess.org the past few years - I seldom play games in real life - that my brain isn't used to the board? Thanks!For instance facing a 1500 on Chess.com is pretty manageable as long as you're thinking, but facing a 1200 on Chess Arena feels like I'm playing a 1800-2000 player from Chess.com. I'm not the best, but I've beaten a few 2000/2100 players, drawn against some national master players, and generally have no worries playing anyone under like 1500.This also skips over some amazing chesscom FREE features: Chess.tv with great streams at all time, that promote creators and provide interesting content all day. The blogs, articles, forums that have no equivalent. chesscom/events, to follow chess tournaments, is better than lichess's or chess24's alternative.Online chess = Garbage. Don't give any money or energy to lichess.con or chess.con. The negative mind spaces you will visit after playing so many cheats is not worth your beautiful energy or well being. Play over-the-board. The battle for energy will at least be fair. Thank me later :) Peace <3 1 week later: The cheat is still not banned.Chesstempo standard: 1500-1600 (5600+ tactics done) Lichess Puzzles: 2000-2100 (Lichess puzzles feel way easier to me, I could probably push my puzzle rating even higher if I properly tried) Lichess Blitz: 1200 : ( (I play a lot of tactics and very little actual chess lol) BrinyEmperor • 1850 rapid chess.com • 2 yr. ago. About Community. A place to discuss the wonderful chess site of lichess.org! Created Nov 14, 2014. r/lichess topics. Chess. Strategy game. Ancient board game. Board game. Tabletop games.Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...MeglioMorto • 7 mo. ago. Marginally simpler approach: from chess.com, on your browser, click on the address bar and type "lichess.org" follower by enter. On the contrary, from lichess: on your browser, click on the address bar and type "chess.com" follower by enter. WingCommando • 7 mo. ago. I guess you and 36 others miss the point entirely.Lichess new Opening explorer feature is absolutely superb :) 478. 54. r/chess. Join. • 12 days ago.You can use this spreadsheet to translate between Chesscom, Lichess and FIDE ratings. Keep in mind that this is only a rough estimation, since some people might be significantly better or worse in online chess compared to OTB chess, or in Rapid compared to Classical. In your case, the estimation for a 1700 Chesscom Rapid player is around 1600 FIDE.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess vs chess.com vs chess24 . The definite chess website Which is the best? votes Chess.com Lichess Chess24 Voting closed Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient ...There isn't a clear difference between 1500 and 1800. 1500s make more blunders. 1500s are more likely to not notice a remove the defender strategy, an overloaded piece, or a underdefended piece. 1500s are more likely to make mistakes in the first few opening moves. At the end of the day, a 1500 Lichess player makes mistakes.chess.com vs lichess. See I hate chess.com's p2w stuff cuz it's way to expensive for any casual player. Though it has a very good UI and the analysis tools. Its easy to navigate and it's ratings make more sense. On the other hand lichess is free and provides infinite stuff. Its UI is kinda bad though.The Glicko rating system and Glicko-2 rating system are methods for assessing a player's strength in games of skill, such as chess and Go. It was invented by Mark Glickman as an improvement on the Elo rating system, and initially intended for the primary use as a chess rating system. Glickman's principal contribution to measurement is "ratings ...Chess.com's 'standard' ratings are an OK approximation for USCF ratings, which are a little inflated compared to FIDE. Based on this and comparison of Chess.com vs Lichess ratings, I'd say that your real life Elo would be between 1700 and 1800. hicetnunc1972. I'd say around 1800 OTB in raw strength, but the time-controls are different so it ...1900 lichess, 1600 chess.com rapid. By now my lichess sample size is way bigger, but exactly for that reason. I haven't had a game on lichess, where I suspected cheating. On chess.com it got ridiculous. Basically started at 1300 I think. Absurd accuracy scores, even in sharp positions.950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz.Chesstempo standard: 1500-1600 (5600+ tactics done) Lichess Puzzles: 2000-2100 (Lichess puzzles feel way easier to me, I could probably push my puzzle rating even higher if I properly tried) Lichess Blitz: 1200 : ( (I play a lot of tactics and very little actual chess lol) BrinyEmperor • 1850 rapid chess.com • 2 yr. ago.It's a legitimate point to make. I do see your point, though, and there are any number of areas where chess.com could take a page from the lichess play book in order to improve. I do use both, so I'd personally like to see chess.com improve to match the feature set of lichess. But in the meantime, lichess is simply a better alternative for a ...To summarize, lichess ratings generally tend to be higher than chess.com ratings, which could indicate that lichess ratings may not be as accurate. However, it is important to consider the differences in player pools, rating algorithms, and the subjective nature of rating systems. Personal experiences can vary, and it is ultimately up to the ...The major advantage of Lichess is the analysis is all free. While chessCom is limited 1 time a day and limited depth for free user. I also prefer Lichess since it has best move arrow before the move happens, while on chess Com you can only see the best move after you play a move. 18.474k members in the chess community. The home of chess on Reddit. Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Search within r/chess. r/chess. ... lichess blitz and standard ratings are significantly higher for most players than fide/uscf.Today I share the best chess website for your chess needs! .....r/chess • You're playing Fischer random as white against Carlsen, who can't see the board and is not told the starting configuration other than what square his king is on. However, the position is still symmetrical and he can hear what moves you make. What's your strategy and do you think you can win?Lichess assigns 1500 as a provisional rating for new players. I believe chess.com uses 1200 instead. As a result chess.com ratings are about 300 points lower than lichess ratings. That's a bit simplistic since everybody is provisional for a while and the rating jumps quite a lot according to that. There are some differences but in general ... View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess > chess.com. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment [deleted] • Additional comment actions. Lichess is better because it inflates my rating by 600 points and ...Lichess Insights alternatives ? I'm kind of a beginner in chess (~1500 on lichess) and although I find the Lichess Insights feature interesting, I wonder if there are other ways to have a global analysis of all your (li)chess games? For example, knowing your win/lose rate given a certain position that might not have an ECO identification.I solved hundreds, even thousands of tactics on lichess and Chess Tempo when I first started. My Chess Tempo rating was in the 1900's while my USCF was around 1000, and I first hit 2000 in CT before I'd made 1200 USCF. The essential problem is that you need to play games to practice and apply what you've improved through solving puzzles.Related Topics. Chess.com's puzzles are somewhat easier because they're usually more thematic, which is because (I believe) they're curated. Lichess puzzles are fully automated in their generation, so the puzzles often feel computerish and many lines have insane refutations to calculate just for the computer to play a completely different move.Puzzles - lichess is better as chess dot com has a limitation on daily puzzles. Strength of players - Chess dot com seems to have stronger players. So, the ratings of an average player are lower compared to lichess. Chess training & lessons - Chess dot com is better compared to lichess.Chess.com has excellent learning material for new players, and I find its user interface more intuitive in many places vs. lichess.org. Chess24.com has good coverage of the chess world, but for playing and learning... meh. Pros: Completely free and open source, good interface for web, great community. White to play: chess.com | lichess.org Black to play : chess.com | lichess.org I'm a computer vision / machine learning bot written by u/pkacprzak | I'm also the first chess eBook Reader: ebook.chessvision.ai | download me as Chrome extension or Firefox add-on and analyze positions from any image/video in a browser | website chessvision.aiChess.com vs lichess I'm a novice and was thinking of becoming a subscribing member to chess.com for the lessons and tactics. I understand chess.com has a nicely structured lesson plan but lichess seems to have everything a absolute beginner would need for free..Chess.com tactics are a bit inpractical, but at least there's only one clear winning or drawing line. It does seem to me like Lichess selects for engine-like precision rather than practical applications of tactics. chess.com has far more, at least in the ~1600 tactics rating level.The Comparison. Overall, not a huge fan of either site’s UX for these features but Chess.com’s flow and UI is a bit more intuitive than Lichess’s and the friends list is a great addition ...Lichess tries to set its average rating to 1500; chess.com generally sets its to 800. However, Lichess generally has a stronger pool of players, so the rating difference works out to typically be about 400, not 700. If I had one Elo point for every time this question gets asked, engines would never stand a chance.Right, but the first 25 moves basically match Stockfish in a novel position so it definitely has some generalization ability. Which is why I find it interesting that it then forgets the rules completelyFrom today (Wednesday 9th March 2022), users with a public and vocal jingoistic pro-war position will no longer be eligible to receive prize money from official Lichess events. Lichess will not offer any official support for events held by the Chess Federations of Russia or Belarus, although it will not ban those federations from the site.Stockfish on Lichess vs GUI I've recently started using an engine to go over my games, and I'm wondering what the advantages are to using Stockfish on Lichess or some GUI like Arena or Lucas. To me, Lichess seems very good since it analyzes the game live as you go through the moves, and you can try out other sidelines and it automatically ...Lichess uses an algorithm to draw puzzles from games in its archive. The algorithm looks for positions where one move is considerably stronger than all other options (or is mating). So it makes sense that it kicks up a lot of tactics and endgames. Not sure how chess.com generates its puzzles. I feel like lichess puzzles are way more instructive ... And honestly the 1200 is also a rough guess, but I think among all people who call themselves chess player, based on the Lichess pool, chess.com pool and the people I know who know the rules but don't have an online account, 900-1000 chess.com rapid would probably be an average and it seems most people call those slightly above their own rating ...Playing the game. In general, the biggest thing a beginner needs to learn to do is not blunder. So that means every turn, checking to make sure every piece is defended, and making sure there are not any checks, captures, or attacks (1 direct move threatening one of your pieces) that you should be worried about.Four years ago, MasterClass, a platform that sells celebrity-taught classes, invited chess legend Garry Kasparov to teach a class. He said yes, but soon realized that creating a message that could satisfy a majority of players was a “strugg...Both sites are equally good, given some non-free extra-features for Chesscom. I play Chesscom and Lichess everyday. In the end I'm able to play competitive chess on both, with a fair enough elo system and a quick matchmaking, so I guess they both complete the original mission of a chess application.I definitely agree about the ratings though. My ICC Rating is 1250 and my lichess rating is 1700. I cannot comment on Chess.com, because I haven't played there in a few years. Gixx • 8 yr. ago. I have very little experience (1100 games on FICS - 5 2 blitz) and 80 games on lichess (15 2 time). I'm rated 1000 on FICS, and 1420 on lichess. even when I'm playing on chess.com, I'm always going straight to lichess afterwards and import the games I wanna analyse. Now I feel stupid. I just used to take the pgn and put it in an analysis board (edit: on lichess), but I could have also imported it and requested a computer analysis, which is not necessary, but more convenient.Mar 24, 2022. 0. #42. Most serious players use Lichess unless they're sponsored. Lichess is better for reasons such as better/quicker analysis, free puzzles and the studying resources. The only upside to chess.com is it's chess learning videos, rating system, and the bots to play against. But you can't beat free and if you're 2000+ Lichess is ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com lessons vs lichess study tab (or other chess websites) vs books vs YouTube, for an absolute beginner . My elo on chess.com is 250 and 800 on lichess. But I want to get better and get a little more serious about chess. And signing up for a chess school is not an ...Chesscom only allows you to play 5 moves deep before it cuts you off of the master database. Lichess has a database of millions of games that you can sort by Master …There is a mate in 2 (1. Rxa2+ Bxa2 2. Nc2#), but the position after 1…Bxa2 is K+N vs K+B, and chess.com would call the game a draw by "insufficient material" before white even gets the chance to play 2. Nc2#. Engine evaluation doesnt care about a faulty insufficient material implementation of GUI.I actually started playing Chess thanks to Lichess' simplistic nature. I would just go to Lichess, press the big button "Play with Friend", choose a time control, accept and send them the link. It was so easy, that I started doing it more and more out of boredom and eventually starting to take Chess seriously.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit Lichess vs. Chess.c*m Blitz rating distribution, proving that just by playing on Lichess, you are automatically a better player than chess.c*m usersIts not about player base but start rating. My lichess rating is about 400 higher than on chess.com but by percentile of players I'm quite a bit higher on chess.com. Even tough I play more and try harder on lichess. My ELO is 500-600 points lower than lichess rating.Also, please, be kind in your replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Old Lichess was harder I think, my rating in new Lichess is higher than old Lichess (now ~2000). Haven't used chesstempo so I can't comment. Despite my complaining I still appreciate Lichess because it's free. Puzzles in lichess now with the new version are very very very good at all levels.Ofc there's a difference, the starting rating points are different. Chesscube was the same way. Someone posted a comparison chart a while ago. Basically, lichess = chess.com + 300 = uscf = fide + 100. Noticed this as wel , rating 1000 on chess.com is about the same as rating 1400 on lichess.nyubet •. Lichess has for free everything that chess.com offers for the most expensive membership. Being a Lichess patreon ("premium" equivalent, but not really) does not offer any other services, everything will be the exact same, the only difference being that you are making an optional donation which allows the site to keep working for ...You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ...Edit: 2200 on chess.com is nowhere near 2400-2500 on lichess youre delusional, its 2350 at MOST. i am on lichess on bullet, blith, rapid and calssical 1700-1800, but on chess my ratingsare around 1150 no joke lol, my highest rating on chess.com is classical which is around 1320. Play more and you will get better, also the younger you are, the ...I've experienced the entire range between 900 and 2100 on Lichess and used to get substantially more toxicity. Now it's a very rare occurence. Yea but people lower rated (I'm 1300 chess.com and 1600 Lichess) don't really play IRL. Especially since the chess boom last year. Oh and the difference between chesscom and lichess is ~250-300, lichess being higher. Your chess.com rating is actually pretty high for 1000 on Lichess. Most Lichess 1000s are around 500 on chess.com. Yes totally normal. Lichess is around 300 points higher than chess.com for low ratings. See my edit. I would say it's probably the latter, chess.com is #189 in Alexa internet ranking and lichess is #1,705. This means that if you are a begginer then you are most likely going to start with chess.com, skewing the player base lower than lichess, which may be harder for begginers to find. I was mandela effect-quantum swapped from a ...If this leak wasn't intentional, it well be the fact that they aren't aware that Lichess's opening book is far more flexible than Chesscom's one. I've come across so many non-Lichess users who simply don't know how to navigate Lichess because they haven't tried to look at everything and click on it.In general, all of the feature's available on lichess are just a little a bit better on chess.com.A lot of this comes down to having more resources. chess.com's Game Review feature is better - there is AI involved that will explain in words why a particular move is better - though the feature is still in it's early stages.The game review feature also does a better job at ranking which moves ...99. 60. r/chess. Join. • 21 days ago. Hikaru on his rivalry vs Magnus: "It wasn't a rivalry until the pandemic. He won every match against me, had a great score against me. Ever since the pandemic I've done better overall. He's one of the two best players of all time, and the fact that I'm able to compete with him makes me very happy."Chess.com and lichess use different rating systems, and give different ratings to new players. Chess.com ratings end up being consistently lower, but that doesn't correspond to you being in a lower percentile of players on chess.com (what parent was talking about). For reference though, I'm 2000 lichess rapid, and 1700 chess.com rapid.Lichess has a better engine and it’s free. They both have the same variants, tournaments, and puzzles too. Chess.com has more variants, though they're not implemented particularly well. For most people, the difference between a depth 20 and depth 15 engine don't really matter that much.Lichess.org has no advertisements. All features are free. Whereas free membership on Chess.com limits you to daily 5 puzzles, and 4 move deep opening explorer. At the end of each game there is an advertisement in the score pop-up box (unless you are using an ad-blocker browser extension). Chess.com has journalists.That makes a huge difference. That means a score of 2100 on lichess is "1.4 times better than average" (which is an oversimplification of how Elo is really calculated and what it represents) whereas a score of 1800 of chesscom is "1.5 times better than average", which is a very minor difference. Share.Lichess vs chess com reddit
Lichess is great. Love the interface. Studies for annotating your games or notes on games are great. It will also make you think you are awesome at chess. My rating on lichess is like 500 elo higher than chess.vo. or chess24, which are much closer in rating.Chess.com's 'standard' ratings are an OK approximation for USCF ratings, which are a little inflated compared to FIDE. Based on this and comparison of Chess.com vs Lichess ratings, I'd say that your real life Elo would be between 1700 and 1800. hicetnunc1972. I'd say around 1800 OTB in raw strength, but the time-controls are different so it ...This version was trained by learning from over 10 million Lichess games between 1500s. Maia Chess is an ongoing research project aiming to make a more human-friendly, useful, and fun chess AI. For more information go to maiachess.com. You can also play @maia1 and @maia9. Developed by @ashtonanderson, @sidsen and @reidmcy. Play.Oh and the difference between chesscom and lichess is ~250-300, lichess being higher. Your chess.com rating is actually pretty high for 1000 on Lichess. Most Lichess 1000s are around 500 on chess.com. Yes totally normal. Lichess is around 300 points higher than chess.com for low ratings.I don't see that chess.com has anything but gimmicks over lichess. Besides, there's loads of good beginner-to-advanced annotated studies, as well as a pretty informative puzzle tracking system, live game broadcasts, and none of it is behind any paywall. If you like chess, play on lichess. If you prefer ads and cheaters, then chesscom is for you.1900 lichess, 1600 chess.com rapid. By now my lichess sample size is way bigger, but exactly for that reason. I haven't had a game on lichess, where I suspected cheating. On chess.com it got ridiculous. Basically started at 1300 I think. Absurd accuracy scores, even in sharp positions.Both sites are equally good, given some non-free extra-features for Chesscom. I play Chesscom and Lichess everyday. In the end I'm able to play competitive chess on both, with a fair enough elo system and a quick matchmaking, so I guess they both complete the original mission of a chess application.Then if you remember to use your thought process during a game your tactics training becomes very useful. I got to 2600 on chess com starting around 1700, idk what that is in lichess equivalent but I assume it's similar if not higher. My rating went up 300 points, and tactics definitely accounted for a lot of this.Chessdotcom and Danny Rensch say that he was auto-banned and later exonerated after manual review. I think this shows that their system prefers false positive classifications because clearly Alireza wasn’t cheating. I don’t see how that’s a controversial opinion. -2.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. How good is the cheating detection at Chess.com vs Lichess? Am a casual so would prefer to use the site that has a better/superior cheating detection system. I had accounts for both sites but don't want have the willpower to figure out if the player is cheating.It has way more stuff than lichens, lessons, drills, daily puzzles, chess engine (and yes, I did do a comparison. I used the Chess.com engine against the lichess stockfish engine, and the chess.com engine reacted much faster and did better than stockfish 8 in lichess). And also, some other game modes like puzzle battle and 4 player chess.Before I got any membership on these websites, chess.com was my favourite because I liked to check out articles and blog posts written on there. lichess is probably the best website if you are only interested in the playing experience. chess24's real strength are its videos which the ones one on chess.com and lichess cannot compare to.Online chess = Garbage. Don't give any money or energy to lichess.con or chess.con. The negative mind spaces you will visit after playing so many cheats is not worth your beautiful energy or well being. Play over-the-board. The battle for energy will at least be fair. Thank me later :) Peace <3 1 week later: The cheat is still not banned.In 3+0 you're more likely to get away with a blunder. In 5+3, you can get very far just by giving your best and you can beat much stronger players because they don't pay attention. 3. RudeVegetable • 1 yr. ago. I have also noticed that 3+0 is a bit stronger than 3+2, and 3+2 is a lot stronger than 5+3. 3. Sinusxdx.This is why ratings on puzzles do not correlate well with actual strength (besides tens of other reasons). The good thing is, it keeps your chess reasoning and tactical ability current. Indirectly it improves your skills over the board or at least make sure you are in a more or less trained condition.Chesscom only allows you to play 5 moves deep before it cuts you off of the master database. Lichess has a database of millions of games that you can sort by Master …For example, for ratings under 2000, the Lichess ratings are higher than the chess.com ones; however, at around 2300, the paradigm begins to reverse, to the point that at the 2800 level chess.com ratings appear to be at least 300 points higher. the ratings. Also, the starting elo on chess.com for most people is 500 or 800 - not 1200.Unfortunately though people come to Reddit and say "I'm 2000 in blitz", but that doesn't mean anything because the sites have different ratings, so naturally people try to compare to gauge skill. ... 2 lichess 1600 vs 1050 on chess.com 10|0 lichess 1450 vs 1200 chess.com So yes for me at leastOld Lichess was harder I think, my rating in new Lichess is higher than old Lichess (now ~2000). Haven't used chesstempo so I can't comment. Despite my complaining I still appreciate Lichess because it's free. Puzzles in lichess now with the new version are very very very good at all levels.Both sites are equally good, given some non-free extra-features for Chesscom. I play Chesscom and Lichess everyday. In the end I'm able to play competitive chess on both, with a fair enough elo system and a quick matchmaking, so I guess they both complete the original mission of a chess application. 700 on lichess is a complete beginner. You should be able to hit 1200-1500 within the first year with hard work. Chess is not easy. Give it time. greenhope42 • 1 yr. ago. That sounds about right. 700 is beginner on Lichess and 250 on chess,com would be a similar beginner level. Rating will change across time controls.A friend of mine made a lichess account. We're "following" each other, but how do I add him so I can see him in my friends list at the bottom right? I see friends referenced there, and then I also see in the settings you can set privacy for your info to be seen by friends only. So it appears to be a feature of Lichess.Lichess tries to set its average rating to 1500; chess.com generally sets its to 800. However, Lichess generally has a stronger pool of players, so the rating difference works out to typically be about 400, not 700. If I had one Elo point for every time this question gets asked, engines would never stand a chance.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Bullet on lichess vs chess.com . I got a new phone, iPhone 13 recently. For some reason when I play bullet on chess.com every move seems like it lags ever so slightly, which it doesn't do on lichess for me. I was playing in an arena last night on chess.com and I lost so ...Actually, chess. com and lichess come nowhere close to chess24 in terms of learning content. Most of the video series are way way to advanced for beginners though, so I would not necessarily recommend chess24 premium either. I fully agree with you when it comes to playing experience and the overall recommendation for beginners.Chess.com standard is roughly in line with USCF, Lichess is 200-300 points higher. I think chess.com rating is more like +/- 300 that of FIDE. But as someone else noted, lichess's ratings are inflated. Chess.com has more members and I think that plays some role in the rating score you have. Apparently Lichess game database is very strongly connected so almost anyone who won at least one game on Lichess will have a WC#. On the results page every column is a chain starting at you and ending at DrNykterstein where every link is a game where someone won against a WC#n holder and earned WC#n+1 rating.Its not about player base but start rating. My lichess rating is about 400 higher than on chess.com but by percentile of players I'm quite a bit higher on chess.com. Even tough I play more and try harder on lichess. My ELO is 500-600 points lower than lichess rating.Lichess has always started players at a rating of 1500, the recommendation of the Glicko system. For several years, chess.com started players at a rating of 1200, despite also using the Glicko system. This difference in their ratings has largely persisted, at higher or lower levels the difference in player strength on the two websites is about ... So e.g. level five is listed as 2000 rating. It lists the estimated Elo next to the username when you play a particular computer opponent. Stockfish level 2 is listed as 1100, level 3 I believe is 1400. Honestly, your post is surprising, because I'm a slightly higher ELO than you against humans (~1100), yet I can barely ever beat stockfish 3.Hi everyone. I've been playing against the computer for years using chess.com, but have started to try lichess given the overwhelming popularity on this sub. I find it infuriating. Please help. I love the mobile board on chess.com, because I can easily hop into analysis to criticize what tactics I'm not seeing. Is this feature available on lichess?For a week, managed to get 700 ratings rapid. So I thought that it was normal for newbies. And then hear about lichess because it's free nature. But after a few games, I got a big jump to 1700 in rapid. So that raises the question of this difference. My initial thought maybe 1700 in chess is the same as 700 in chess.com.It makes a lot of sense, since Lichess ratings don't go below 600. So necessarily a sub 600 chess.com would still be at least 600 on Lichess (and the average difference is just smaller of course) The gap gets much smaller the higher your rating gets. I'm Lichess about 2000 & Chess.com about 1900.Lichess is just a better layout and chess.com seems to have more cheaters on it. Chess.com also wants money for legit everything including tactics, and chess.com …Mar 24, 2022. 0. #42. Most serious players use Lichess unless they're sponsored. Lichess is better for reasons such as better/quicker analysis, free puzzles and the studying resources. The only upside to chess.com is it's chess learning videos, rating system, and the bots to play against. But you can't beat free and if you're 2000+ Lichess is ...I've experienced the entire range between 900 and 2100 on Lichess and used to get substantially more toxicity. Now it's a very rare occurence. Yea but people lower rated (I'm 1300 chess.com and 1600 Lichess) don't really …There are a lot of Chess 2 versions, but finally, we have our answer on which version is the best. Congratulation to 5D Chess with Multiverse Time Travel for winning the heart of r/AnarchyChess! 1 / 6. First, we have our winner. 521.Hi everyone. I've been playing against the computer for years using chess.com, but have started to try lichess given the overwhelming popularity on this sub. I find it infuriating. Please help. I love the mobile board on chess.com, because I can easily hop into analysis to criticize what tactics I'm not seeing. Is this feature available on lichess? A year ago I was rated about 2100 Rapid on Lichess (peak of 2150). I found it relatively easy to float around 2100. I then took a break from chess and closed my old account. I needed a solid break from chess. I recently came back and started a new account. I started off badly and floated around 1900 for a couple of months I was rusty and ...Jan 1, 2023 · Chess.com Rating vs. FIDE and USCF. The Chess.com ratings map pretty closely to USCF and FIDE ratings overall. You can use it generally as a quick mapping to your USCF rating. USCF ratings start at 100, and the Chess.com equivalent is slightly under 500. Between 100 and 1750, the 400-point gap shrinks as the rating-level increases. The short answer is Chess.com is better if you subscribe to the top tier diamond subscription. Lichess still is useful, but the Chess.com lessons, tactics (puzzles), videos, and drills are better. I also prefer the analysis feature. Lichess is awesome because it is free.Lichess is 100% free and has a bit cleaner an interface. Better for puzzles and playing in general if you just want games/tournaments. chess.com has some things locked behind premium accounts (e.g. puzzles), but has more tutorials, videos, community, analysis, etc. Like a one stop shop for all your chess needs, but a more cluttered interface ...Lone vote for diamond here. I like the unlimited puzzles and lessons, also chess.com hosts their own tourneys that too GMs play in, they just seem more tied on to the chess world somehow. I like lichess and play there if I'm drunk and don't care about my rating.Lichess's interface felt slicker when playing fast chess. In fact, on Lichess some players would play bullet at 15 seconds and 30 seconds time controls. Pretty wild. And on Lichess newer players like Penguin made their name. Carlsen played some tournaments on Lichess for fun and when he won he would donate the reward to the next tournament.I think the main aspect you're ignoring is that chess.com (and chess24) aren't just focused on offering a chess-playing environment, but also a chess-learning environment.Lichess doesn't really have any learning materials, which is what the real benefit of premium memberships on the premium sites is.On chess.com, they don't offer that. You have to flip back and forth between screens if you want to see all three. I see chess.com as great for the newer players, and Lichess as being better once you hit say 800 on Chess.com. Note that the rating system is different, chess.com is about 300-400 points below Lichess.I am a low rated player of about 1600 on lichess and 1350 on Chess.com. In order to improve my game recently, I decided to use one of the amazing plug-ins mentioned in one of the posts a couple of weeks ago. The results on chess.com were amazing.Chess.com has excellent learning material for new players, and I find its user interface more intuitive in many places vs. lichess.org. Chess24.com has good coverage of the chess world, but for playing and learning... meh. Pros: Completely free and open source, good interface for web, great community.The best thing about daily chess (online correspondence-like) is you will play book lines even if you’re both less experienced, because opening book is allowed. Thus you get a chance to learn proper theory in game. You won’t be playing long book lines in lower level short time formats. 8.I'm 1700 classical on lichess, and 1600 on chess.com, 1900 blitz and 1700 on chess.com, and 2100 bullet and 2050 on chess.com. I personally feel like chess.com has weaker opposition: perhaps because it's more mainstream, it's the first result for "online chess". It probably attracts casuals and patzers.791K subscribers in the chess community. All about the game of chess, including discussions on professional tournaments, game analysis and theory. If…You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ... There's no incentive to being a Lichess patron for someone that's asking for subscriptions to help learn, which in this case would be chess.com learning resources / articles, or chess24's resources. (Just adding that I agree that you should be a Lichess patron if possible to support the site, and I recently became one as well.)Lichess has a better engine and it’s free. They both have the same variants, tournaments, and puzzles too. Chess.com has more variants, though they're not implemented particularly well. For most people, the difference between a depth 20 and depth 15 engine don't really matter that much.There are a lot of Chess 2 versions, but finally, we have our answer on which version is the best. Congratulation to 5D Chess with Multiverse Time Travel for winning the heart of r/AnarchyChess! 1 / 6. First, we have our winner. 521.For a week, managed to get 700 ratings rapid. So I thought that it was normal for newbies. And then hear about lichess because it's free nature. But after a few games, I got a big jump to 1700 in rapid. So that raises the question of this difference. My initial thought maybe 1700 in chess is the same as 700 in chess.com.I know on lichess and chess.com the elo levels are not distributed at the same skill level, with what I've seen being lichess is around 400 points or so inflated compared to chess.com. However, after around a month and a half playing and sitting comfortably at 1050 or so on chess.com, I'm struggling on lichess to break past 1200.The stigma of lichess rating inflation comes from two things. The player pool used to be much weaker, so I would hit 1400 a few years ago, take a long break from chess, then come back stronger but loose points because the "average" player had gotten a bit strongerChess com puzzles do seem to be more theoretical, while lichess ones feel more like they are taken out of actual games. But overall, I find that both tend to evaluate things on material counts (the 9 for queen, 5 for rook, etc.) rather than straight positional compositions. UnlawfulFoxy • 8 mo. ago.Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...Lichess's rating can be 200-300 points higher than chess.com because the default starting rating (which is a convention choice in any rating system) is 300 points higher than chess.com 's one (1500 vs. 1200). You could say that chess.com 's rating is closer to actual FIDE rating, but that's also inaccurate because 1) those ratings refer to ... Then if you remember to use your thought process during a game your tactics training becomes very useful. I got to 2600 on chess com starting around 1700, idk what that is in lichess equivalent but I assume it's similar if not higher. My rating went up 300 points, and tactics definitely accounted for a lot of this.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Difference in ELO Lichess and Chess.com . Hey people, I have question. My lichess rating is 1500 (but i can be challenging to 1700-1800 people) and my chess.com rating 1100 (can be challenging to 1300-1400). ... Realistic comparison in lichess rating cs chess.com rating vs ...The chess.com puzzles have kinda bizarre ratings , they don't make much sense until you get over 2000 . Some of the ones rated 400 or even lower can have a trick to it, and many of the ones between about 1400-1900 are "do this aggressive looking move and the problem ends", where it is actually quite a lot of work to correctly calculate that that is the best move.. Wsiltv.com